When Palestinian artist Ashraf Fayadh was tried last year on blasphemy-related charges, the Saudi judges overseeing the case rejected the prosecution’s request for a death sentence for apostasy.
Instead, he was sentenced to 800 lashes and four years in prison over a book of poetry he wrote and for allegedly having illicit relations with women.
An appeal was filed and the case was sent back to the lower court, but this time around judges threw out defence witness testimony, refused to accept Mr Fayadh’s repentance and on November 17 sentenced him to execution for apostasy.
His friends are now asking how the case could draw such different verdicts, especially when, according to US-based Human Rights Watch, two of the three judges in the original case also served in the retrial.
The case illustrates how courts in Saudi Arabia can issue vastly different punishments based on how judges interpret Islamic law, a system derived from scholarly interpretations of the Koran and verified and documented rulings and sayings of the prophet Muhammad.
According to Human Rights Watch, which is closely monitoring the case, Mr Fayadh was charged with blasphemy, spreading atheism and having an illicit relationship with women, based on pictures found on his phone. He told the court the pictures were of women he had met at an art gallery.
A copy of the court’s ruling obtained by The Associated Press sheds some light into how judges came to issue the death sentence.
Mr Fayadh’s friends had submitted testimony disputing the veracity of a complaint filed to the religious police by an acquaintance who accused him of making blasphemous comments about God, the prophet Muhammad and the Saudi state during a heated discussion at a cafe in Abha, the south-western city where the case was heard.
The one-page court document says their testimony was not accepted in the retrial because the defendant’s own “admission is the strongest evidence”, without specifying what Mr Fayadh admitted to. He was arrested and released within a day for that argument in August 2013, Human Rights Watch says.
Just days earlier, Mr Fayadh’s friends say he may have caught the attention of religious police when he filmed one of them slapping a man on the face and forcibly pinning him against a wall in Abha. The video on YouTube has been viewed nearly 195,000 times.
While judges in the initial trial accepted Mr Fayadh’s repentance for anything deemed offensive to religion in his poetry book, judges in the retrial said the case was considered an instance of hadd – specific crimes, such as apostasy, that have fixed punishments in Islam.
Sharia is open to various interpretations, and many Muslim clerics say the death penalty is not the standard punishment for someone who leaves the faith or is an apostate, sourcing it to the prophet Muhammad’s pardon of a Muslim who had renounced Islam.
Saudi Arabia’s ultra-conservative teachings of Islam, known as Wahhabism, have drawn comparisons to some of the ideologies underpinning the Islamic State, which executes non-Muslims and Muslims alike for criticism of the faith. In Saudi Arabia, however, there are no known cases in recent years of executions for apostasy, though 152 people have been executed this year for crimes such as murder, rape and drug smuggling, according to Amnesty International.
Saudi sharia courts can issue discretionary judgments on a wide number of crimes, which also gives way to leniency. But in crimes of hadd, even the Saudi king cannot issue a pardon, though he can interject if there are questions around how the case was handled, according to Human Rights Watch researcher Adam Coogle, and Mr Fayadh’s friends who are familiar with the case.
Mr Fayadh’s brother-in-law, Osama Abu Raya, was quoted on the Saudi al-Watan news website this week describing the artist’s 2008 Arabic poetry book, Instructions Within, as a compilation of his thoughts as a young man. He said the book was not widely published. The court began assessing the book only last year after the man who filed the complaint against him also mentioned his poetry to the religious police. Then a fatwa council, which issues religious edicts, was asked to analyse it.
The Saudi government’s human rights body says it sent representatives to meet Mr Fayadh in prison in Abha, where he has been under arrest since January 2014. Mr Fayadh’s case will likely be bumped back to the appeals court and then to the Supreme Court for a final ruling.